Networker

Re: [Networker] Bar Code reader on drive?

2009-12-08 04:48:52
Subject: Re: [Networker] Bar Code reader on drive?
From: Conrad Macina <conrad.macina AT PFIZER DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 04:47:15 -0500
A STK library with four drives requires five connections to the server, one
for each drive and one for the robot. A Quantum library, on the other hand,
only would require four connections because the robot connects through one
of the drives. That's why loaderinfo shows "No" for all the drives in an STK
library and "Yes" for one drive in a Quantum -- that's the drive through
which the robot connects.

HTH,

Conrad Macina
Pfizer, Inc.



On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 17:17:10 -0500, George Sinclair
<George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>We have an old Quantum tape library with four SDLT600 drives. This is
>running on a RH Linux snode. I notice that when I run the loaderinfo
>command as:
>
>/usr/sbin/loaderinfo -f /dev/sg#
>
>it reports "Bar Code Reader: No" for drive 1 of 4, but "Yes" when I run
>the command against the other three drives. Otherwise, the values
>reported from the command are all the same between the drives, and all
>drives have the same firmware.
>
>I'm not sure what this value really implies, anyway, given that the
>picker is the hardware that would have a bar code reader and not the
>drive, correct? When I run loaderinfo against the picker device, it
>reports 'Yes' for this value.
>
>Drive 1 of 4 functions fine, with or without bar codes tapes, so the
>fact that this setting is 'No' doesn't seem to be causing it any problems.
>
>But anyone know why this would report 'No' and how to set it to 'Yes'?
>Maybe it should be 'No' and the others should also be 'No'?
>
>I notice on our STK LTO-3 tape library, however, that all the drives
>report 'No', including the medium changer, too! But, again, everything
>functions just fine on there.
>
>Thanks.
>
>George
>
>
>--
>George Sinclair
>Voice: (301) 713-3284 x210
>- The preceding message is personal and does not reflect any official or
>unofficial position of the United States Department of Commerce -
>- Any opinions expressed in this message are NOT those of the US Govt. -
>
>To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
>type
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
>via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
>=========================================================================

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>