Networker

Re: [Networker] How to use multiple AFTD devices

2009-10-22 11:28:51
Subject: Re: [Networker] How to use multiple AFTD devices
From: Thierry FAIDHERBE <thierry.faidherbe AT FOREM DOT BE>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:54:39 +0200
Yes and no : AFD are NOT like tape : When 1 is full, the Session
is suspended until AFD space is recovered and does NOT continue
to another dev even if it is labelled in same pool.

So, best is to create 2 AFDs, in 2 separate pools. Do load balancing
of your backups, some to AFD1's pool, the others to AFD2's pool.

I have 6 AFDs devices defined as E:\AFD, F:\AFD, G:\AFD, 
H:\AFD, I:\AFD and J:\AFD each one labelled in its own pool and I do
load balancing of my backups using groups. (define groups in AFD pool
authorized group list)

Works like a charm. E and F are 2TB Luns I stage in parallel.
Then stage as you need. Do not forget, 1 read (recover/stage/clone)
operation a time per device :-)

Cheers

Th

-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On
Behalf Of MIchael Leone
Sent: jeudi 22 octobre 2009 15:41
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] How to use multiple AFTD devices

I have a question. I have a Windows NW 7.4.2 storage node that I use as an 
AFTD device. The disk space in question is presented from my SAN. So I 
define the device as "FQDN:drive letter\file path", and this all works 
wonderfully - I back up to disk, then clone to tape.

Problem: I need enough space to total 2.5 TB in size, and my SAN only 
allows me to present at most a  2 TB disk (it's an HP EVA 8000). So what I 
was thinking - present 2 disks on 1.2TB each (the daily backup size is 1.1 
TB, so 2 drives would allow me to keep 2 days backup on disk).

What kind of config do I need to tell NetWorker? Do I just define 2 
devices, and as long as they are both in the same media pool, things will 
Just Work? Will NetWorker treat it the same way it treats tapes - i.e., 
will it fill up drive X: first, then start using drive Y:? Will it use 
parallelism, and write to X: and Y: at the same time? I'm guessing that I 
can define multiple AFTDs this way, right?

Has anyone done this? Is there something I am not taking into account?

Thanks
-- 
Michael Leone
Network Administrator, ISM
Philadelphia Housing Authority
2500 Jackson St
Philadelphia, PA 19145
Tel:  215-684-4180
Cell: 215-252-0143
<mailto:michael.leone AT pha.phila DOT gov>

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER