Networker

Re: [Networker] SQL Server 2008 Transaction Logs not truncated by backups

2009-08-12 17:03:15
Subject: Re: [Networker] SQL Server 2008 Transaction Logs not truncated by backups
From: Michael Jones <Jones_Michael2 AT EMC DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:58:00 -0400
Will require two client definitions, one using the "Full Always"
schedule at 1:00AM and the other using the "Incr Always" schedule at
1:00PM. 

-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On
Behalf Of Trey Clanton
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 6:06 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] SQL Server 2008 Transaction Logs not truncated by
backups

Networker performs a Full backup of my SQL databases daily at 1am using
EMC Networker Module for MS SQL Server v.5.2.0.71. This backup is
initiated from my Networker server v. 7.5.1 Build 269. I believe if I
performed incremental backups the transaction logs would be truncated. I
would prefer to continue to take fulls at 1am and add an incremental at
1pm. I would also prefer to control both of these with 1 schedule. Is
this possible? Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Trey Clanton

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>