Networker

Re: [Networker] Index vs. saveset browse/retention policies

2009-05-27 16:39:47
Subject: Re: [Networker] Index vs. saveset browse/retention policies
From: Len Philpot <Len.Philpot AT CLECO DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:36:19 -0500
> Tim Mooney 
> 
> > Is there something obvious I've overlooked? Can I somehow force X & 
Y's
> > indexes to be subject to the shorter policies? Or is this just the way 
it
> > is?
> 
> Sure, nsrmm will do that for you.  Look at the last usage synopsis in 
the
> man page (or PDF docs of the man page, since it appears you may be on
> windows).  You want the -w and -e options, as well as the saveset ids.

OK - I see how I could script that (I'm on Solaris, backing up several 
platforms) after the fact, and indeed I may have to do that. Do you know 
if there's a way to force the index for a given client to be subject to 
that client's policies (instead of the backup server) when written, 
instead of manually after the fact?

Thanks for the info!!

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER