I agree that NMC is better off on servers other then master server, 
however, there may be many companies that only has one master server, last 
time i tried migrating to NMC to SN i ran into issues, i will have to take 
up that project again.
Thanks



Stan Horwitz <stan AT temple DOT edu> 
03/05/2009 03:38 PM

To
EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>, 
<Fazil.Saiyed AT ANIXTER DOT COM>
cc

Subject
Re: [Networker] v7.4.2 to v7.4.4









> From: Fazil Saiyed <Fazil.Saiyed AT ANIXTER DOT COM>
> Reply-To: EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>,
> <Fazil.Saiyed AT ANIXTER DOT COM>
> Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:31:53 -0600
> To: <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>
> Subject: Re: [Networker] v7.4.2 to v7.4.4
> 
> Why not just make GST a dependent service for the last networker service
> that starts up. 

Ideally, the Console Manager should be run on a different system other 
than
the NetWorker server. That way, when gstd starts, after the NetWorker
daemons start on a server is immaterial. It also takes some of the load 
off
the NetWorker server. The console GUI will also be more responsive.

I set up the NMC on a Vmware Linux system several months ago after running
it on my Solaris 10 NetWorker server for over a year. 



To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER