Re: [Networker] Upgrade to LTO4 library, opinions about these libraries ?
2009-02-20 11:53:18
We have a SpectraLogic T120 (3xLTO4, 60 slots) with FC interface to our SAN.
I've been very happy with its performance. It's been in production for
about a year. It's fast and I haven't had any problems with it. The
support contract is expensive, but the support has always been excellent.
Our networker server is a SUN SunFire V245 (sparc) OS10 running Networker 7.4.
Janis Klimowicz
Desert Research Institute
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: [Networker] Upgrade to LTO4 library, opinions about these libraries ?, Goslin, Paul |
Next by Date: |
Re: [Networker] Upgrade to LTO4 library, opinions about these libraries ?, Browning, David |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: [Networker] Upgrade to LTO4 library, opinions about these libraries ?, Browning, David |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [Networker] Upgrade to LTO4 library, opinions about these libraries ?, Macina, Conrad |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|