Networker

Re: [Networker] Newbie question: Networker 7.1.4 - scanning in tapes?

2009-02-06 22:55:55
Subject: Re: [Networker] Newbie question: Networker 7.1.4 - scanning in tapes?
From: Preston de Guise <enterprise.backup AT GMAIL DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 14:48:18 +1100
On 07/02/2009, at 10:14 , Tim Mooney wrote:

Since you have 14 tapes, there's at least a possibility that some of the savesets you have will span tapes (start on one and finish on some other volume). In cases like that, in theory it doesn't matter what order you
scan the tapes in, but in practice things will go more smoothly if you
actually scan volumes in the correct order


One thing I'll point out here is that in various cases over the last few years I've had several EMC support staff (both front line and PSEs) insist that the order in which you scan in spanned savesets _is_ important - i.e., you must scan from start to finish. Certainly my experience under say, v5 and v6 of NetWorker was that it didn't matter - you could just scan in the spanning saveset in any volume order and it would stitch them all together. However, I have had a few support issues in the last 3-4 years that have been resolved by dumping a previously scanned saveset from the media database and then rescanning in a meticulously correct order.

Cheers,

Preston.

--
Preston de Guise


"Enterprise Systems Backup and Recovery: A Corporate Insurance Policy":

http://www.amazon.com/Enterprise-Systems-Backup-Recovery-Corporate/dp/1420076396

http://www.enterprisesystemsbackup.com

NetWorker blog:

http://nsrd.wordpress.com


To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type 
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request 
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the 
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER