|
Re: [Networker] 7.4.2 -> 7.4.4 or 7.5 - upgrade thoughts/recommendations
2009-02-02 02:22:43
On 02/02/2009, at 03:21 , Stan Horwitz wrote:
From: Yaron Zabary <yaron AT ARISTO.TAU.AC DOT IL>
My experience is not so great with feedback to the list and I have
already mentioned that in the past, EMC employees never reply as it
seems that EMC do not encourage open, two-way discussion on this list
(or elsewhere). Regardless, I will give it a try:
. Avamar integration is poor. As already mentioned on this thread,
EMC should have Avamar better integrated in Networker. I have given
up
hope of getting any useful dedup from EMC and waiting for ZFS dedup
to
solve this problem (AFTD on top of deduped ZFS).
<snip>
From what I have been told by people at EMC, some of the features on
your
list are planned for upcoming NetWorker versions. EMC doesn't
respond to
feedback on this list here, but some EMC people definitely do read the
postings here and give them due consideration, especially on an
issue that's
reported by numerous people.
I'd also recommend that you make use of the
networker_usability AT emc DOT com email address. Mentioned only a couple of
days ago by an EMC employee wanting feedback on NetWorker
functionality (Skip Hanson), this is a great way of providing direct
feedback to product management.
Cheers,
Preston.
--
Preston de Guise
"Enterprise Systems Backup and Recovery: A Corporate Insurance Policy":
http://www.amazon.com/Enterprise-Systems-Backup-Recovery-Corporate/dp/1420076396
http://www.enterprisesystemsbackup.com
NetWorker blog:
http://nsrd.wordpress.com
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
|
|
