Davina Treiber <Davina.Treiber AT PeeVRo.co DOT uk> wrote on 05/29/2008
11:01:15
AM:
> MIchael Leone wrote:
> > EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU> wrote on
> > 05/29/2008 10:21:15 AM:
> >
> >> The "max parallelism" set to 4 seems fishy to me. If you want 5 jobs
to
> >> run, doesn't this need to be increased to at least 5?
> >
> > Don't think so .. my other 4 drive library is set to 4, and it
definitely
> > runs 5 or more jobs at the same time.
> >
> > I believe the parallelism refers to the total number of drives that
can be
> > in use at one time, not the total number of jobs that be run acorss
the
> > sum of all the drives.
>
> No it's not that at all. Max parallelism on the library controls how
> many tape operations may run simultaneously, such as tape
> mounts/unmounts, label operations, inventory operations etc. It has no
> bearing on how many save sessions may be run.
Well, that's close to what I said. :-) So any idea how can I specify to
run more clone jobs that the number of physical drives in the library? I
know that regular backup jobs (i.e., not backup clones) will execute more
jobs simulataneously than there are physical drives. Someone posted that
they thought that backup clone jobs were single-threaded, and thus if I
have 4 drives, only 4 backup clone jobs would execute at one time.
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|