Networker

[Networker] NMC Reporting; Accuracy?

2008-01-29 10:43:40
Subject: [Networker] NMC Reporting; Accuracy?
From: iNetSpy <inetspy AT EARTHLINK DOT NET>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:38:22 -0500
Has anyone else noticed inaccurate reporting from the REPORT tab of NMC?

We have been speaking with EMC about this.

In the old days, if a feature did not work, it was not included in the
software. You know save it for a new release.

Any of your experiences very much appreciated.

/ALE

P.S. Ref: Top Posting - I am a fan of the quick, the accurate and the easy.
My posting style/preference is: Make it readable, (in a ludicrous way of
trying to save bandwidth) I delete all of the data that does not pertain to
the comment I am making. I prefer to bottom post, but Outlook does not do
that automatically anymore. /shrug on the other hand, the hammer does not
automatically swing on to the nail either... I had no idea there were such
strong opinions either way...

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Networker] NMC Reporting; Accuracy?, iNetSpy <=