Re: [Networker] Top-posting and quoting
2008-01-29 09:31:15
EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU> wrote on
01/28/2008 06:57:44 PM:
> Tim Mooney wrote:
>
> > Call me elitist if you wish, but I would place more weight on the
opinions
> > of the people that answer the preponderance of the questions. The
term
> > you once used for those people was "NetWorker List Superstars".
>
> As someone who has posted a few times on this list in the past, I will
> weigh in with my opinion. Personally I detest top posting. I think a
> readable reply to a discussion should take the form of one or more
> responses to points made by the poster whose message you are replying
> to. All the rest of the chaff should be disposed of.
>
> However - this really depends on the tools available. Most decent mail
> clients make in-line replies quite simple, by automatically quoting the
> previous message. This includes sophisticated quality mail clients such
> as Thunderbird and many others, and also some old text based favourites
> such as elm, pine, and good old mailx.
>
> There is one abomination of a proprietary mail client which makes
> in-line posting extremely difficult, and virtually forces the user to
> top-post.
You must mean a Blackberry, because when I used Outlook, I used to
bottom-post all the time. It's not hard, nor impossible - just a couple of
extra steps. I even do it on the current abomination of a mail client I
currently use (Notes).
> Unfortunately this particular mail client is widely used due
> to it being about the only client compatible with a widely used
> proprietary backend mail server,
I did used to use Thunderbird IMAP client with Exchange, to read and send
email. You can't do scheduling with anything except Outlook, but we're not
talking about scheduling.
I can live with top posting. Not trimming, or not quoting back *anything*,
is highly aggravating.
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Networker] Top-posting and quoting, (continued)
- Re: [Networker] Top-posting and quoting, Tim Mooney
- Re: [Networker] Top-posting and quoting, Curtis Preston
- Re: [Networker] Top-posting and quoting, Dag Nygren
- Re: [Networker] Top-posting and quoting, Tim Mooney
- Re: [Networker] Top-posting and quoting, Curtis Preston
- Re: [Networker] Top-posting and quoting, Tim Mooney
- Re: [Networker] Top-posting and quoting, Davina Treiber
- Re: [Networker] Top-posting and quoting, Curtis Preston
- Re: [Networker] Top-posting and quoting, Rohrich, James
- Re: [Networker] Top-posting and quoting, Tobias Speckbacher
- Re: [Networker] Top-posting and quoting,
MIchael Leone <=
- Re: [Networker] Top-posting and quoting, Curtis Preston
- Re: [Networker] Top-posting and quoting, Curtis Preston
- Re: [Networker] Top-posting and quoting, Peter Viertel
- Re: [Networker] Top-posting and quoting, Stan Horwitz
Re: [Networker] Top-posting and quoting, Werth, Dave
Re: [Networker] Top-posting and quoting, Vincent Lin
|
|
|