Geez,

It's something I never really thought about but now that I have I don't
really care that much.  If the subject of the message is of interest to
me I'll probably wade through it regardless of the format, if it isn't I
just delete it after I figure out it isn't of interest.

I guess my style is if the response requires multiple responses to
multiple points then I intersperse the comments, otherwise I respond
like this.  I suppose it's partially because I use Outlook and that's
the default for me but at home I use Thunderbird and it puts me at the
bottom and I usually go back to the top to respond with it as well.  It
ticks me off I have to search for the response at the bottom of several
pages of previous message.  I try to remove extraneous stuff when making
a reply but don't always remember when making a quick one.

So I vote "I don't care."

David Werth
Garmin AT, Inc
Salem, Oregon
dave.werth<at>garmin.com

-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On
Behalf Of Curtis Preston
Subject: Re: [Networker] Top-posting and quoting


Actually, we're not in disagreement.  I'd be ok with giving you one vote
for every posting you've ever done to the list last year.  What I was
more concerned about is the general level of interest polls get.  If
there are 1800 members on this list, and only 20 people vote, then I
don't see that as a valid poll.

-------------------------
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole 
use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please be 
aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any 
attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please 
contact the sender and delete all copies.
Thank you for your cooperation

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER