[Networker] Cloning parallelism
2008-01-23 17:07:37
Darren Dunhame wrote
>
> What is the advantage to loading a VTL tape a minimal number of times?
> On (much older) devices I've worked with, that load time was very
> short. And demuxing a VTL is much easier than demuxing a physical tape.
>
> --
> Darren Dunham ddunham AT taos DOT
> com
> Senior Technical Consultant TAOS http://www.taos.com/
> Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area
> < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >
>
>
> via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
I have a concern that if I don't, that then I'll have contention for the same
source tape for several clone processes. My main objective is to utilize all
of the available physical drives for cloning in order to minimize the overall
clone time. If I organize the clone processes to do all the reading from a
particular virtual drive at once, I'm hoping the physical drives will be used
more efficiently. My concerns may very well turn out to be moot though.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by drhulme AT tarrantcounty DOT com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
|
|