On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 12:49:04PM -0500, Matthew Huff wrote:
> Yes, mounting the share to a server is the only way, but it has issues
> such as performance, permissions and acl restores.

I don't recall issues with permissions/ACLs.  But I do dislike it purely
from a data tracking issue.  If you think about your data in terms of
the nas server, you'll have to track the bakcups in terms of the backup
client that mounts it instead.

-- 
Darren Dunham                                           ddunham AT taos DOT com
Senior Technical Consultant         TAOS            http://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper?                           San Francisco, CA bay area
         < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER