Networker

Re: [Networker] Should core directories/files be skipped?

2007-09-12 14:18:07
Subject: Re: [Networker] Should core directories/files be skipped?
From: Stan Horwitz <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:11:33 -0400
On Sep 12, 2007, at 1:03 PM, George Sinclair wrote:

Hi,

By default, the 'Unix standard directives' skips all core files as:

<< / >>
       skip: tmp_mnt
       +skip: core

This is the directive I usually use for most clients, but I've found that this causes any file or directory with the name 'core' to get skipped (not surprising, of course), even if it lives under some other file system other than / (that seems kinda surprising). I would have thought that in order for a directory named 'core' to get skipped under, say, '/export/disk2/core', assuming /disk2 is a separate file system, that there would need to be another entry for this in the directive but apparently not. Anyway, maybe skipping core files is not a bad idea (some can be quite large), but maybe we should still remove the line that does this so in case a user, or some software package, creates a directory named 'core' it will get backed up? For example, consider the following directory:

I used to skip core files too, then some VIP happened to lose a file on a failed hard drive. The file name was "core." Right than and there, I took out that directive. Better to back up too many files than not enough!

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type 
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request 
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the 
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER