Don't forget though, that when you change the target sessions, you
should go and check your parallelism as well (Parallelism = number of
target sessions * number of devices).
-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On
Behalf Of Francis Swasey
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 9:01 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] groups not completing although no client
backups running!
Yes, I think they are the same problem. However, I do have a "Indexes"
pool that all groups save their indexes to.
The change that I made before this started (other than weird NetWorker
crashes) was to reduce the target sessions on the two AFTD indexes pool
volumes from 40 to 1 -- believing it would better balance the load
across the two that way. I have just now increased that target back up
to 25. I'll see if that makes this problem go away for me.
Frank
On 8/15/07 8:44 AM, Kantor, Adam wrote:
> Ultimately it sounds like the same problem that the other guy had. I
> was having similar issue and just happen to have the luxury of having
> an EMC Networker Resident here on site. He basically said that all
> indexes should be going to their own pool. We have multiple client
> types: AIX, HPUX, Linux, Solaris, Windows, etc and he said that we
> were having issues, because our networker server was windows and when
> we backed up these other client types, sometimes things would hang due
> to the OS mismatch. Every client now backs its index up to a specific
> pool and we haven't had this issue since.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU]
> On Behalf Of Francis Swasey
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 8:10 AM
> To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: [Networker] groups not completing although no client
> backups running!
>
> I am having a similar issue. And when I stop the group that says it
> is 100% complete but is still running, the savegroup mail message will
> tell me that some client Index was not run.
>
> It's as if the 7.3.2 JumboUpdate 1 (Build 399) code is losing track of
> what it is doing.
>
> But your post prompted me to remember that I have something similar
> (that was open with EMC briefly) -- the NMC monitoring sessions
> doesn't properly clean up some sessions that really finish (client
> initiated
> saves) -- I wonder if this issue is related to LGTpa91748 as I think
> it is nsrjobd that is accused in that issue and could be related here.
>
--
Frank Swasey | http://www.uvm.edu/~fcs
Sr Systems Administrator | Always remember: You are UNIQUE,
University of Vermont | just like everyone else.
"I am not young enough to know everything." - Oscar Wilde (1854-1900)
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or via RSS at
http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY
This electronic message, including attachments, is for the sole use of the
named recipient and may contain confidential or privileged information
protected by New York State, and Federal regulations. Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure, copying or distribution is strictly prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient or have received this communication
in error please contact the sender or email.security AT bassett DOT org and
destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
