I would drop those PIG SLOW LTO-2 drives. (Yeah kinda spoiled like
that)... But outside of that your config looks ok.
Keywords... "Redundant bandWIDTH".
Quite honestly, I am very intested in your project. Could you please
document your steps & trials and share them with me...errr, I meant to
say US, yes US. <Grin> that being said...
I would not want to do what you are doing (rebuild using same name,
etc.) my gut is telling me safety is in a new hostname.
Licensing Oy-Vey... Nightmare on EMC drive... EMC FOLKS, can you post a
reply to the list and tell us this answer? E-GOLD, if EMC doesn't pipe
up, please share the answer they give you?
Networker Ninja <tm> --> headin' for the parking lot! /ALE
-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On
Behalf Of E Gold
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 1:33 PM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] Migrating Legato from Windows 2003 to RedHat 4
Linux
Hi All,
I have a legato 7.3.2 jumbo 1 server running on win2003.
I want to migrate over to redhat 4 linux as painlessly as possible and
keep
all my configs , etc.
What is the best way to do this? Do I need to get new licenses?
I want to named the linux server with the same hostname as the windows
server so the clients dont need to be touched.
Do you think I would get better performance on linux vs windows for the
same hardware?
My server will be a new HP with 2 fast quad core cpus (total of 8
cores),
8GB RAM, 6 fiber channel LTO2 tape drives, and a quad NIC card teamed
up.
Thanks.
____________________________________
This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain proprietary, confidential and/or privileged information. Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If
you
are not the intended recipient (or an employee or agent responsible to
deliver it to the intended recipient), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and
kindly
notify the sender by reply e-mail.
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
--------------------------------------------------------
This message w/attachments (message) may be privileged, confidential or
proprietary, and if you are not an intended recipient, please notify the
sender, do not use or share it and delete it. Unless specifically indicated,
this message is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of any investment
products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any
transaction, or an official statement of Merrill Lynch. Subject to applicable
law, Merrill Lynch may monitor, review and retain e-communications (EC)
traveling through its networks/systems. The laws of the country of each
sender/recipient may impact the handling of EC, and EC may be archived,
supervised and produced in countries other than the country in which you are
located. This message cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. This
message is subject to terms available at the following link:
http://www.ml.com/e-communications_terms/. By messaging with Merrill Lynch you
consent to the foregoing.
--------------------------------------------------------
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
