Networker

Re: [Networker] 2 Part Question

2007-05-15 13:48:45
Subject: Re: [Networker] 2 Part Question
From: "Werth, Dave" <dave.werth AT GARMIN DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:45:00 -0500
It depends on how you do it but if you set NetWorker to automatically
clone tape to tape the clone will NOT be demultiplexed.  If you clone
manually one save set at a time then you will have a demultiplexed
clone.

One other comment on the discussion about faster restoring from a
demultiplexed clone.  While it would be faster I wonder if it's really
that much faster.  I'd love to see some data on that.  I suspect it's
more like you might save 5 minutes or so on a 2 hour restore.  For me
that sort of time saving wouldn't be worth the effort to demultiplex the
clone.  I guess the more streams you have in the multiplex the better
your time saving would be from demultiplexing (more tape between each
piece of the particular stream you are restoring increasing the seek
time to find the next piece) so there would be a point where it becomes
worthwhile but doubt our parallelism of 12 reaches that point.

Dave


David Werth
Garmin AT, Inc
Salem, Oregon
dave.werth<at>garmin.com

-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 10:30 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] 2 Part Question

So let me get this straight, cloning one saveset off of a tape to
another
clone tape will demultiplex the saveset.


Patricia Neal
Production Support Specialist
C.S.E.A.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Darren Dunham" <ddunham AT TAOS DOT COM>
To: <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Networker] 2 Part Question


> > Not to re-open that can of worms, but did we ever conclude what
> > happens when cloning is enabled for a group? I want to say that
that's
> > tantamount to passing multiple savesets into nsrclone?
>
> I'm not sure.  I've specifically avoided any comment on group-based
> cloning because I've never tested it.
>
> I'm *assuming* that it's similar to a multiple-saveset nsrclone, but
> have no data on it.
>
>
> -- 
> Darren Dunham
ddunham AT taos DOT com
> Senior Technical Consultant         TAOS
http://www.taos.com/
> Got some Dr Pepper?                           San Francisco, CA bay
area
>          < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >
>
> To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at http://l
> istserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
> via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
>

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

------------------------- 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole 
use of the intended recipient.  If you are not the intended recipient, please 
be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or 
any attachment is prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error, 
please contact the sender and delete all copies. 
Thank you for your cooperation 

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER