Networker

Re: [Networker] volretent versus save set expirations

2006-07-10 17:12:13
Subject: Re: [Networker] volretent versus save set expirations
From: "Kevin M. Counts" <counts AT DIGICAT DOT ORG>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:10:54 -0400
Darren -

Thanks for running this in the lab. After your findings I'm
definitely going to keep the extra sanity check in my procedure.

Kevin

On 2006-07-10 13:24, Darren Dunham wrote:
> > I'm new to networker so I might have my semantics wrong as
> > far as what volretent means.
> > 
> > I would assume (thats the first problem right? ;-) that volretent would
> > be equal to the latest expiration on all contained save sets? Is
> > this my misunderstanding?
> 
> Hm.. I thought this was true.  But I just tried some stuff (on 6.1.2)
> and found that extending the retent time of a saveset did not also
> extend the retent time of a (expired) volume.
> 
> -- 
> Darren Dunham                                           ddunham AT taos DOT 
> com
> Senior Technical Consultant         TAOS            http://www.taos.com/
> Got some Dr Pepper?                           San Francisco, CA bay area

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu 
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>