Client licenses are kind of a fixed cost (unless we talk about server 
consolidate - but
thats an entirely different subject - too much of a tangent for here).  I 
was referring
to the autochanger licenses - where it is cost benficial to cram as much 
data into
a single slot as possible.

Albert Eddie Contractor AFRPA CIO/IT <Eddie.Albert AT AFRPA.PENTAGON.AF DOT 
MIL> 
wrote on 05/25/2006 10:02:59 AM:

> Comments below...
> 
> > versus the two we have now.  Also consider the product we all 
> > are using, Legato, which licenses based on number of slots of 
> > tape storage (until you get to 512 or more - then you get an 
> > unlimited license).
> 
> What are you talking about? My legato licenses are based on # of
> (server) clients not tape slots.
> 
> /ALE





Jefferies archives and reviews outgoing and incoming e-mail.  It may be 
produced at the request of regulators or in connection with civil litigation. 
Jefferies accepts no liability for any errors or omissions arising as a result 
of  transmission. Use by other than intended recipients is prohibited.

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu 
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER