On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Darren Dunham wrote:

DD> > DD> > DD> Just to check, is the volume 'location' field either blank or 
the same
DD> > DD> > DD> as the library it's in?  If it's set to something else, then the
DD> > DD> > DD> behavior you see is expected.
DD> > DD> > It is the same as the library as it is in.
DD> > DD> You did that by hand with mmlocate before you ran the inventory?  Is
DD> > DD> that part of your normal procedure?  I would test it once with a blank
DD> > DD> 'location' just to see if that had any effect.
DD> > 
DD> > No, the location was still there, even though the jukebox had been 
DD> > deleted.
DD> I see.  The volumes weren't "withdrawn", just the JB was deleted and
DD> recreated.  I missed that initially.
DD> 
DD> If you withdraw and redeposit a volume, does it still require a check of
DD> the tape label?

I didn't try that, but after running an additional inevntory, the need to 
scan those volumes were no longer necessary. I regret that I don't have a 
better idea of how the first inventory went, there were several problam 
surfacing simultaneously.

Oh well.

//Oscar

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu 
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER