Networker

Re: [Networker] Question on Networker Barcode sequence?

2006-01-04 02:15:47
Subject: Re: [Networker] Question on Networker Barcode sequence?
From: Anuj Mediratta <anuj AT ACE-DATA DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 12:37:33 +0530
Whenever you label or re-label tapes using the barcodes, the name would
still be the same as barcodes. Therefore, your tapes would get relabeled
with the same names.

If you want to proceed with new numbers or further in a sequence, use label
templates for labelling.

Regards,
Anuj Mediratta
Phone: +919312634262
To know more about our services, do log on to www.ace-data.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Legato NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] 
On
Behalf Of Ultra Kiasu
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 6:41 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] Question on Networker Barcode sequence?

I had a tape retention of one week, and I had labelled tape with "match
barcode", where I had tapes with barcode label "001" to "014".

If I labelled these tape, the volume id would be 001 to 014.

After 1 week, if I relabelled the "001" tape after one week, would the
networker pick the 008 or 001 as next tape for use?

Thanks.

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type
"signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu 
if
you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu 
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>