Re: [Networker] Compare Netoworker to other backup products
2005-10-31 12:44:14
> Not to stroke the fire anymore, but that is good documentation about tcp
> tuning and sysctl, however what I was explaining was the lack of
> consistency and documentation for controling the hardcoding/auto setting
> of various ethernet drivers in Linux. Unless there is a tool I have yet
> to find, the settings have to be setup in /etc/modules.conf or
> /etc/conf.modules with parameters that seem to only be documented in the
> source code or README files in the drivers code.
Version 2.6 of the kernel has most of the drivers conforming to the
new specifications for doing this and you can use ethtool to set
the parameters
Dag
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Networker] Compare Netoworker to other backup products, (continued)
- Re: [Networker] Compare Netoworker to other backup products, Peter Viertel
- Re: [Networker] Compare Netoworker to other backup products, Matthew Huff
- Re: [Networker] Compare Netoworker to other backup products, Matthew Huff
- Re: [Networker] Compare Netoworker to other backup products, Robert Maiello
- Re: [Networker] Compare Netoworker to other backup products, Matthew Huff
- Re: [Networker] Compare Netoworker to other backup products, Jones, Steven
- Re: [Networker] Compare Netoworker to other backup products, Matthew Huff
- Re: [Networker] Compare Netoworker to other backup products,
Dag Nygren <=
- Re: [Networker] Compare Netoworker to other backup products, Matthew Huff
|
|
|