As our networker server is a solaris system I say the W2K3 storage nodes.
But as certain solaris tools which can manage tape devices had also to be
disabled I would suppose W2K3 networker servers too.
Freundliche Grüße
Roman Böhm / Kind regards
>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: King, David - Eastman [mailto:dking AT eastman DOT com]
>Gesendet: Freitag, 28. Oktober 2005 14:05
>An: Legato NetWorker discussion; IT-Administration ST
>Betreff: RE: [Networker] AW: [Networker] sudden change in
>tape capacity?
>
>Are you saying that the RSM should be disabled on W2K3
>Networker servers and W2K3 storage nodes?
>
>
>David L. King
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Legato NetWorker discussion
>[mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
>IT-Administration ST
>Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 5:00 AM
>To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
>Subject: [Networker] AW: [Networker] sudden change in tape capacity?
>
>Hello dear fellow-networkers,
>
>we faced the problem of premature marking tapes as full both
>with DLT8000 drives and with LTO2 drives for a couple of
>months. As the native capacity of LTO2 tapes is 200 GB, you
>must know what it looks like when a 200 GB tape is marked
>full at the capacity of !!! 0 kB !!!.
>
>As the reason was is claimed by leading supporters and
>hardware experts of the Siemens company that there happen
>undesired tape rewinds. As the block size at the tape header
>differs from the block size of the data section after the
>header, when Networker notices that it got a different block
>size it will mark the tape as full and mark the savesets as suspect.
>
>Maintaining networker storage nodes we had to disable the
>"Removable storage Manager" of Win2k resp. Win2k3. The funny
>thing is that how Legato introduces Networker 7.x it sounds
>like if Networker and the removable storage manager would be
>"best friends".
>
>
> Freundliche Grüße / Kind regards
>
> Roman Böhm
>
>
>
>
>
> >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >Von: Legato NetWorker discussion
> >[mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] Im Auftrag von
>Albert >Eddie Contractor AFRPA/ESS
> >Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. Oktober 2005 23:08
> >An: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
> >Betreff: Re: [Networker] sudden change in tape capacity?
> >
> >My OS is (Key-up Darkside music here) Windows 2003, but it
>is >the same symptom.
> >
> >For the compression issue, there are compression settings
>in >both the Networker Software and hardware setting for the
>tape >drive, you may have compression OFF somewhere.
> >
> >
> >Man I love it when I am right and I get to help
>>someone...Woo-Hoo! /ALE > >Eddie Albert, Network Serf
>>Air Force Real Property Agency >Executive Services/Computer
>Systems >Desk (703) 696 - 5509 - Hip (703) 517-3855
>>Eddie.Albert AT afrpa.Pentagon.af DOT mil
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Matt Temple [mailto:mht AT research.dfci.harvard DOT edu]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2:22 PM >> To: Albert
>Eddie Contractor AFRPA/ESS >> Cc: Legato NetWorker
>discussion >> Subject: Re: [Networker] sudden change in tape
>capacity?
> >>
> >> Albert Eddie Contractor AFRPA/ESS wrote:
> >>
> >> >I don't know about the control arm thing.
> >> >
> >> >But the thing we have in common was the premature
>marking >> tapes FULL at >> >80 GB and my library was SCSI
>attached using the same controller.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Very strange. I did upgrade the firmware on the drives. I
> >> had forgotten,
> >> because there were so many other problems -- that's why I
> >upgraded the >> firmware.
> >> But now I"m going to have a look at the dates:
> >>
> >> October 10 is when I moved the sony file:
>sdx900v_0102.x90 There >> seems to be a relationship.
> >>
> >> Density was erratic before that -- as low as 90 and as
>high as 180.
> >> But now it's never above 80 gb.
> >> I've NEVER gotten 200 gb on these tapes. I have an ASC39160
> >> controller
> >> card I'm going to substitute. I don't normally see any scsi
> >> errors to
> >> account
> >> for this. Right now I'm getting much more data on my
>AIT-3 tapes!
> >> Really strange. What version Linux are you using? What driver?
> >>
> >> >Is it possible you/someone upgraded the firmware on your
>drive >> >with(out) your knowledge?
> >> >
> >> >Could someone have upgraded the drivers for your drives
>>> with(out) your >> >knowledge?
> >> >
> >> >While speaking to the elite tech support folks at Legato
> >> they said that >> >can happen when Legato Networker
>receives "too many" SCSI errors.
> >> >
> >> >They didn't tell me how many was too many... Sorry.
> >> >
> >> >Hope this helps.
> >> >
> >> >Semper Fidelis, /ALE
> >> >
> >> >Eddie Albert, Network Serf
> >> >Air Force Real Property Agency
> >> >Executive Services/Computer Systems >> >Desk (703) 696
>- 5509 - Hip (703) 517-3855 >> >Eddie.Albert AT afrpa.Pentagon.af DOT mil
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>-----Original Message-----
> >> >>From: Legato NetWorker discussion
> >> >>[mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
>Matt Temple >> >>Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 11:27 AM
>>> >>To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU >> >>Subject:
>[Networker] sudden change in tape capacity?
> >> >>
> >> >>All,
> >> >>
> >> >> Something very strange has happened to my storage node...
> >> >>First of all, the node is a 126-slot Qualstar with 3
>AIT-4 drives.
> >> >>For a number of months, this unit has worked well.
>It's attached
> >> >>to an HP server running Fedora core 1. I know this isn't
> >> officially
> >> >>supported, but has always worked flawlessly on both the
> >server and >> >>this storage node.
> >> >>
> >> >> Something suddenly changed. First, I had some really
> >> >>weird robot-amr failures, including one instance where
>a tape was >> >>sitting ejected from one of the drives and
>there was a tape
> >> >>in the gripper arm waiting to be inserted. I haven't
> >seen that in
> >> >>all of the 7 years I've been using Networker. On at least
> >> >>one occasion, I've attempted to move a tape with the
>>library front >> >>panel and received a message that the
>source was empty
> >> >>(ejected tape) when it clearly was not. And suddenly,
>the tapes
> >> >>are being marked full with about 80 GB (these are
>AIT-4) >> with no error >> >>messages showing up. I'm
>using an Adaptec 39320A
> >> >>and the AIC79XX driver. This is a dual channel card and
> >> >>I've switched
> >> >>the two
> >> >>cables around -- no change -- just erratic behavior,
>and >occasional >> >>time when the robot arm doesn't move
>on program command >(it always >> >>moves by front panel) >> >>
> >> >> I plan to install a different SCSI card --
> >> 39160 to see if
> >> >>there's any
> >> >>change. Any ideas of what's going on? Does this kind
> >of erratic
> >> >>scenario seem familiar to anyone?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>Matt Temple
> >> >>
> >> >>--
>
> >> >>=============================================================
> >> >>Matthew Temple Tel: 617/632-2597
> >> >>Director, Research Computing Fax: 617/582-7820
> >> >>Dana-Farber Cancer Institute mht AT research.dfci.harvard DOT edu
> >> >>44 Binney Street, LG300/300 http://research.dfci.harvard.edu
> >> >>Boston, MA 02115 Choice is the Choice!
> >> >>
> >> >>To sign off this list, send email to
>listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu >> >>and type "signoff networker"
> >> in the body
> >> >>of the email. Please write to
> >> networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if >> >>you have
>any problems wit this list. You can access the >archives at
>>> >>http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
>via RSS at >> >>http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> =============================================================
> >> Matthew Temple Tel: 617/632-2597
> >> Director, Research Computing Fax: 617/582-7820
> >> Dana-Farber Cancer Institute mht AT research.dfci.harvard DOT edu
> >> 44 Binney Street, LG300/300 http://research.dfci.harvard.edu
> >> Boston, MA 02115 Choice is the Choice!
> >>
> >>
> >
> >To sign off this list, send email to
> >listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type "signoff networker"
>in >the body of the email. Please write to
>>networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any
>>problems wit this list. You can access the archives at
>>http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or via
>RSS >at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
> >
>
>To sign off this list, send email to
>listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type "signoff networker" in
>the body of the email. Please write to
>networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any
>problems wit this list. You can access the archives at
>http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or via RSS
>at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
>
>[* Internet Mail *]
>
>
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
