Re: [Networker] Parallelism???
2005-06-24 09:06:53
As a matter of interest,
I have found that "generally" around the 4 or 5 // per drive is a good average
between decent backup performance and a acceptable restore speed (in most of
our environments).
Depending on the number of clients being backed up at any given time - I
normally try and keep the client // relatively low (2). IF there is a issue
with specific clients having horrid throughput's I try and isolate them
separately.
The server // is then dependant on the number of drives you have (i.e. you set
the server // to that. Remember that if you only have 1 drive and a server //
of 16 - you will be backing up 16 sessions to tape as server over rides tape
//).
Obviously in the larger environments you need some decent CPU / more drives /
more memory.
I have seen before that having wrong drivers / network cards have chewed up CPU
on systems.
Regards,
Riaan
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
|
|
|