Networker

Re: [Networker] Restore questions

2005-06-23 00:29:10
Subject: Re: [Networker] Restore questions
From: Scott Russell <lnxgeek AT US.IBM DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:22:11 -0400
Werth, Dave wrote:
The restore of E:\ took about 11 hours.  The restore of F:\ took about 8.5
hours (including restoring the 2 incrementals that followed it).  Since the
two drives are of similar size (F being 3.6% larger) that is a substantial
difference.

Right here is the potential trap with saveset recoveries. Suppose you have the following situation:

Day 1: Full back up drive E:\
Later that day after the full backup:
  .. Existing FileA deleted
  .. New FileB added
  .. Existing FileC modified
Day 2: Incremental backup of drive E:\

Now let's say on Day 3 you have to restore the entire drive E:\. When you restore the saveset from Day 1 you're going to get FileA, FileB, and FileC. When you restore the saveset from Day 2 you're going to get the updated version of FileC.

What you're left with is FileA which shouldn't be there after Day 2 anyway. In other words, when restoring using multiple savesets depending on your backup strategy it is possible to end up with extra files that were deleted.

As far as index scanning goes, savesets are faster because the up front time to calculate what files need restoring isn't done however with an index based recovery you eliminate the problems of extra files showing up. As far as I've seen the index scanning only takes place PRIOR to the file copies off the tape to the disk. Once the files start moving off the tapes the index based recovery doesn't appear any slower or faster than a saveset recovery.

All based on observation and experience. I should really read the manuals some day. ;)

--
Scott Russell <lnxgeek AT us.ibm DOT com>
IBM Linux Technology Center System Admin

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=