Networker

Re: [Networker] question on purpose of sji* commands

2005-06-16 11:38:25
Subject: Re: [Networker] question on purpose of sji* commands
From: Tim Cassidy <tcassid AT KIMBALL DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:36:17 -0500
You are correct. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Legato NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU]
On Behalf Of Ty Young
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 9:01 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] question on purpose of sji* commands

All,

Can someone confirm for me that the purpose behind the sji* commands
such
as

      sjirdtag
      sjirdelem
      sjiinq

(under NetWorker 7.1.x and above) are to read the *jukebox* elements, as
opposed to what NetWorker thinks is in each one?

i.e. if I believe there's a discrepancy between the jb's inventory and
what
nsrjb -C is telling me, I could use sjirdtag because this command
actually
polls the jukebox itself.  Is this correct?

Thx

-ty

Phillip T. ("Ty") Young, DMA
Manager, Data Center and Backup/Recovery Services
Information Services
i2 Technologies, Inc.

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via
email
to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>