Networker

Re: [Networker] Auto media verify?

2004-05-06 12:19:34
Subject: Re: [Networker] Auto media verify?
From: "Maarten Boot (CWEU-USERS/CWNL)" <Maarten.Boot AT NL.COMPUWARE DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 18:19:24 +0200
The interesting quiestion is 'why is it not on by default' and why can you not
set it on on the Default Pool, how silly of them

Maarten

On Thursday 06 May 2004 17:27, you wrote:
> > What exactly is NetWorker doing when auto media verify is enabled?
>
> First the man page definition...
>
>      auto media verify   (read/write, yes/no, choice)
>           If set to  yes,  NetWorker  verifies  data  written  to
>           volumes  from  this  pool.   Data  is  verified  by re-
>           positioning the volume to read a portion  of  the  data
>           previously  written to the media and comparing the data
>           read to the original data written.  If  the  data  read
>           matches the data written, verification succeeds; other-
>           wise it fails.  Media is  verified  whenever  a  volume
>           becomes  full  while saving and it is necessary to con-
>           tinue onto another volume, or when a volume  goes  idle
>           because  all  save sets being written to the volume are
>           complete. [...]
>
> My take is that this is a defense against tape drives that over-buffer.
> Basically it was (or is) possible to run into drives that have large
> buffers for speed, might read 8K of data from the host, but then after
> they acknowledge that the data was received, discover that there's only
> 5K of tape left.  Oops.
>
> When the tape is marked full, Networker still has the last block of data
> in memory, so it can go and ask the drive to replay its last block and
> verify that it made the tape.  This doesn't take very long and is good
> insurance.
>
> If the verify works okay, the save stream continues on another volume.
> If it fails, the ssid is failed and marked incomplete.
>
> > Does it make sense to have this enabled for a clone pool?
>
> Since the issue is with tapes and drives, I don't see why not.
>
> > I have a pool that I do enable this for because it sounded like it might
> > provide some additional checks, although it probably slows things down,
> > too, I'm sure, and the checks may be cursory at best. I'm thinking I
> > might want to turn it on for the clone as well. Guess it couldn't hurt?
>
> I don't think it slows down anything except when drives stop.
>
>
> --
> Darren Dunham                                           ddunham AT taos DOT 
> com
> Senior Technical Consultant         TAOS            http://www.taos.com/
> Got some Dr Pepper?                           San Francisco, CA bay area
>          < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >
>
> --
> Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
> to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
> http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
> also view and post messages to the list.
> =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>