"atif" wrote:
>Are there any issues anyone can think of that I should consider?
>Also, we might be able to survive with 80GB fs. Any thoughts on that?
>Thanks.

We have used 300GB file systems with Windows 2000, but have decided
against them because they take too long to back up and even longer to
restore. I'm not sure what size is favoured now.

Smaller filesystems means the server can be backed up faster since each
filesystem is backed up seperately.


greetings,

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=