Networker

Re: [Networker] LTO2 V/s 9940B

2004-02-23 07:50:26
Subject: Re: [Networker] LTO2 V/s 9940B
From: "Schaefer, Harry" <Harry.Schaefer AT TURNER DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 07:50:11 -0500
Are you saying that you will be backing up 50TB per night? It seems either way 
you go that 40 drives seems like overkill for 200 clients, especially with 
drives that can stream at upwards of 50 m/sec...

Harry S.
Atlanta


-----Original Message-----
From: Puneet Gulati [mailto:puneet.gulati AT SUN DOT COM]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 6:08 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] LTO2 V/s 9940B


Hi Gurus

I will really appreciate if you can help me decide which one should I
choose LTO2 OR 9940B.

Data Size: 50TB
Nmber of drives planning : 40 via ful fab SAN 2GB
Plan to use networker 7.1 with 200 clients
Duty cycle: 12 hours

If you moved from LTO2 to 9940B or vice versa , due to some problem then
please share your experince(s).

Thanks in advance

Puneet

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>