We have a storage node in a remote office, and have a 512K circuit
between.

When I first implemented the storage node, I was concerned about the
bandwidth between the two sites.  We are only backing up one Exchange
5.5 machine on the storage node, and the network traffic between the
Networker server and storage node has been minimal.  I'm not sure how
the traffic would look like with 5+ clients at the remote site using the
remote storage node.

On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 14:38, Fields, David wrote:
> I'm curious as to the feasibility of installing a storage node in a remote
> office.  I've been told that due to the amount of traffic that is sent to
> update the index's on the main Networker server via a WAN link that there
> can be some problems where the backups don't run correctly.  It has been
> suggested that we run a separate business edition server at the remote site,
> and just use remote admin instead of setting up a storage node.
>
>
>
> The WAN link in question is, at max, 512Kb Frame-Relay, and there would be
> 5-6 clients in the remote office.  I thought that one of the reasons for
> storage nodes was for just this reason, but I want to make sure we do the
> right thing.  If anyone has any experience with this, please let me know.
>
>
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> David Fields
>
> ACS
>
>  <mailto:david.fields AT acs-inc DOT com> david.fields AT acs-inc DOT com
>
>
>
>
> --
> Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
> to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
> http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
> also view and post messages to the list.
> =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=