Networker

Re: [Networker] Need help using save command to back up multiple files

2003-11-24 13:36:08
Subject: Re: [Networker] Need help using save command to back up multiple files
From: George Sinclair <George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 13:36:02 -0500
Thanks, Byron! I guess that makes sense. I'll simply have the script
loop through each one, one at a time, since their will never be more
than a few, and they're not too big to prevent me from finishing them in
a single night. Thin is, I could recover from something like /path/, but
it makes it really hard to know exactly what was under there at the time
since the files are deleted every month, and there's no other listings,
and they're not consistent in terms of how many might be out there on
any given backup.

George

Byron Servies wrote:
>
> On Monday, November 24, 2003, at 10:20 AM, George Sinclair wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to figure out how to use the save command to back up
> > multiple
> > pathnames wherein each pathname will be subsequently individually
> > listed
> > under saveset recover as opposed to simply the most common pathname
> > prefix.
>
> Hi there!
>
> A saveset is a group of files backed up in a single save session.  As
> far as I know, you cannot create multiple savesets with a single
> invocation of save, and even if you did all of the "expensive"
> operations (e.g. open a new index session, new media db session, etc.)
> would all still have to take place.
>
> You need to run save for each item in order to get a new saveset id
> that can then be used with saveset recover.
>
> > The pool I am using has indexing turned off, so there's no need for me
> > to use the '-S' option. I do not care about browsing these. I have come
> > to the conclusion that when backing up 2 or more pathnames, it will be
> > necessary to run each one separately, or if running from a script, then
> > simply loop through the save command for each desired pathname. This is
> > more time consuming because it will not be multiplexing, but at least
> > it
> > works. Alternatively, I guess each save could be launched as a separate
> > process. This is frustrating because the nsrclone command seems to
> > support separate pathnames without lumping everything under one common
> > path.
> >
>
> If you run all the save commands at once the separate streams will
> multiplex.
>
> Byron
>
> --
> Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
> to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
> http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
> also view and post messages to the list.
> =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=