Networker

Re: [Networker] Weirdness when cloning

2003-11-13 02:29:11
Subject: Re: [Networker] Weirdness when cloning
From: Itzik Meirson <imeirson AT MBI.CO DOT IL>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:27:50 +0200
Hi George,
There are currently some mysterious issues in regard to tapes usage
during cloning.
I know it is handled currently under LGTpa49963 that is not
closed/verified yet.
This has to do with the time it takes the device/tape to become (be
declared) idle after it completes the writing.
Itzik

> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Sinclair [mailto:George.Sinclair AT noaa DOT gov]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 21:39
> To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
> Subject: [Networker] Weirdness when cloning
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Seeing strange problem when cloning, not sure what to think! Not seen
> this before.
> 
> I have two available clone volumes, and when I run a clone operation,
> NetWorker insists on cloning the saveset to one clone volume and the
> index to the other clone volume rather than just sending everything to
> one clone volume. It seems to do this when the ssids thatI'm cloning
are
> from different tapes.
> 
> Here are the details: I have two clone pool volumes: ARC_c001,
ARC_c002.
> Both have plenty of space. I try to clone 4 savesets. 2 are on volume:
> ARC001, and the other 2 are client indexes located on volume: ARC002.
> 
> ARC001, and both clone tapes are on storage node library. ARC002 is on
> primary server's library.
> 
> When I run clone command as: nsrclone -s server -b 'ARC Clone' -S
ssid1
> ssid2 ssid3 ssid4
> 
> NetWorker clones two savesets to ARC_c001 (just what you'd expect),
and
> then when it starts to clone the two indexes it issues: "Device or
> resource busy" message for the drive that has volume ARC0_c001. It
then
> loads ARC_c002 into another drive and clones the indexes to that tape,
> not ARC_c001! If I then run the command again, using different ssids,
> the same thing happens, but this time it writes the first two savesets
> to ARC_c002 and then issues the "Device or resource busy" message on
the
> device containing ARC_c002 and then clones the indexes to ARC_c001. So
> this is the reverse of the earlier. Subsequent tests just keep
producing
> the same swapping results. I don't understand why NetWorker has to
clone
> the last two savesets to another volume member when there's plenty of
> space on the first one, and it started on the first one. Makes no
sense,
> and like I said, the results change back and forth with every run. I
> even tried cloning just two savesets, one on one tape (ARC001) and one
> index on another (ARC002) and same results. This does not occur when
> both ssids are on the same tape, HOWEVER.
> 
> I've cloned lots of stuff before to other clone pools (not ARC Clone),
> and I've never seen this behavior, but I never had more than one
> available tape before either. Hmm.... My experience was always been
that
> NetWorker didn't care how many ssids were contained on how many
> different tapes. It would clone all of them to the same clone volume
and
> not to a different one until it ran out of space on the former then it
> goes to the next.
> 
> Anyone seen this? I tried re-labeling the tapes, still happens. We're
> runnng 6.1.1. Storage node is using Linux Red Hat, and primary server
is
> running Solaris 2.8. also 6.1.1. If I delete one of the clone volumes,
> so I only have one, and try again, it just sits and waits for the
second
> volume after cloning the first ssid(s). Not good.
> 
> Noticed that if I re-label one of the two ARC Clone volumes as
something
> else -- any other pool -- so I only have one ARC Clone pool tape
> available, NetWorker acts normal. It writes everything to just the one
> tape and never issues any device or resource messages. For some
reason,
> though, having two available clone volumes causes the problem, and I
> have the sessions for each device set to 5, and the number I'm cloning
> is less than that. Strange!  The thing is that I would like to have
two
> clone volumes available so
> when one fills up, NetWorker will have another one to load. I can't
rely
> on auto-media management because NetWorker will not necessarily select
a
> tape that has the proper bar code.
> 
> Would greatly appreciate any help.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> George
> George.Sinclair AT noaa DOT gov
> 
> --
> Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via
email
> to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
> http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
> also view and post messages to the list.
> =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

**************************************************************************************************
The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential.
It is intended for the named recipient(s) only.
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager or  
the 
sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any one or make copies.

MBI - System Team
**************************************************************************************************

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=