Re: [Networker] v6.1.2 vs 6.1.3
2003-06-13 09:16:03
Teresa
We just upgraded to 6.1.3 on Solaris 8 and there have been no issues. Our
environment is is very complex, we have 16 9940 tape drives and have our
Networker Servers clustered using LAAM. We have 2 Sunfire 6800 with 8gig of
RAM and 8 CPU.
Prior to 6.1.3 we were running 6.1.1 and had a lot of issues and there are
a lot of fixes in 6.1.3
Ken Ciolek
SAN Storage Administrator
Open Systems Support - Storage
(973)533-2094
(973)277-1148 (Cell)
(888)463-9721 (Pager)
Ken.Ciolek AT aig DOT com
-----Original Message-----
From: Teresa Biehler [mailto:tpbsys AT RIT DOT EDU]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 8:17 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] v6.1.2 vs 6.1.3
Hi,
We're are planning an upgrade. We currently run v6.0.3 on Tru64 v4.0f
and we're planning on implementing v6.1.x on Solaris. Based on recent
posts, it seems like there are a number of issues with v6.1.3. Is
v6.1.2 more stable?
Thanks.
Teresa
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
|
|
|