Glad to see it was resolved, but just for the record, I believe the proper
way to designate the pool for these indexes would have been to
specify "index:clientname", rather than "server:clientname:index".

Regards,
Carl Farnsworth
DigiDyne Inc.

On Fri, 25 Apr 2003 18:52:53 +0200, Oscar NOSPAM Olsson <spam1 AT QBRANCH DOT 
SE>
wrote:

>On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Mark T Wragge wrote:
>
>MTW> So although my filer data and index are backed up to the same pool
they are
>MTW> always to seperate tapes.  If I do not have a tape in this pool in the
>MTW> library of the networker server then the group will never complete as
there
>MTW> will be a pending message requesting a tape.
>
>Well, either way, the solution was much more simple than I thought. It is
>possible to mix savesets from NDMP clients and non-NDMP clients. One just
>has to allow the NDMP pool to use all tape devices in the library. Then it
>mounts a tape from that pool on a non-NDMP tape device and writes the
>index there. I have tried mounting a tape that has only indexes on it on
>the NDMP tape device and starting the savegroup that contains NDMP
>clients, and it has saved data to that tape successfully as well.
>
>Conclusion: The information I had previously received off-list about not
>mixing NDMP savesets and non-NDMP savesets was incorrect. Everything works
>now.
>
>//Oscar
>
>--
>Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
>to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
>http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
>also view and post messages to the list.
>=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=