Networker

Re: [Networker] Merits of cloning versus dual backups?

2003-04-23 08:38:03
Subject: Re: [Networker] Merits of cloning versus dual backups?
From: Joel Fisher <jfisher AT WFUBMC DOT EDU>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:38:01 -0400
Hmmmm.... I would think it would be impossible to get the clone speeds
I'm getting if it is doing any type of de-multiplexing.  Still would
like to hear for one of the Legato people on the list.

Joel

-----Original Message-----
From: Tarjei T. Jensen [mailto:tarjei.jensen AT KVAERNER DOT COM] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 7:50 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] Merits of cloning versus dual backups?

Joel Fisher wrote:
>Then I believe the chunks on the clone tape will be:
>
>[222...][222...][444...][222...][444...][222...][444...][666...][222...
]
>[666...]
>
>I'd loved to hear a Legato person chime in here to verify or correct
>what I'm saying?!?!

The story we have been told is that cloning untangles the savesets and
optimizes them for recover.

greetings,

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via
email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>