Nice little plug there, Sunil ;)

We've found that our LTO customers are rock-solid compared to our SDLT
customers. LTO2 is just coming out, and is the current winner in terms
of native speed and capacity with 30MB/sec and 200GB. SDLT320 is
supposed to be much more reliable than SDLT220, but we've only just
started deploying it.. SDLT220 caused more trouble for us than it was
worth.

Cheers,
John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tilve, Sunil (HPS-PUNE) [mailto:Sunil.Tilve AT HP DOT COM] 
> Sent: Monday, 10 February 2003 18:09
> To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: [Networker] LTO vs SDLT
> 
> 
> hi,
> 
>   Both are  very reliable & Perpformance wise similar product 
> , your going for the Library then go for any HP Library 
> Ultrium/SDLT which will work on SAN. Your palnning to use  
> This on Legato Backup solution.
> 
> Thanks & Regards
> Sunil 
>   
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dbhasin AT HSS.HNS DOT COM [mailto:dbhasin AT HSS.HNS DOT COM]
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 11:16 AM
> To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
> Subject: [Networker] LTO vs SDLT
> 
> 
> Hi Guys,
> 
> I am planning to purchase a new Storage System, and confused 
> between LTO and SDLT.
> 
> Can you please share ur experiences with me, I will be going 
> for LANless and Serverless backup very soon and will connect 
> the library to SAN.
> 
> If any of u can provide me the difference in performance and 
> vice versa.
> 
> Regards
> Deepak
> HSS
> 
> DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Hughes Software 
> Systems Limited (HSS) and is intended solely for the use of 
> the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain  
> privileged or confidential information  and should not be 
> circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is 
> intended. If you have received this message in error, please 
> notify the originator immediately. If you are not the 
> intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly 
> prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the 
> contents of this message. HSS accepts no responsibility for 
> loss or damage arising from the use of the information 
> transmitted by this email including damage from virus.
> 
> --
> Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" 
> command via email to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit 
> the list's Web site at 
> http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.> html where you 
> can also view and post messages to the list. 
> =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
> 
> --
> Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" 
> command via email to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit 
> the list's Web site at 
> http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.> html where you 
> can also view and post messages to the list. 
> =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
> 

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=