Re: [Networker] tape drive hardware compression a bad thing?
2003-01-29 09:39:19
Jim,
We've used hardware compression for years (Solaris 2.6/DLT4000) and never
had problems when recovering data.
Best regards,
Vince
_________________________________________
Vince Howard
Programmer/UNIX Systems Administrator
Wansbeck District Council
Front Street West
Bedlington
Northumberland
NE22 5TU
UK
Tel (direct line): +44 (0)1670 843472
fax: +44 (0)1670 843486 / 843484
e-mail: v.howard AT wansbeck.gov DOT uk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Lane [mailto:JLane AT TORONTOHYDRO DOT COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:18 PM
> To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
> Subject: tape drive hardware compression a bad thing?
>
>
> Hi, All
>
> I recently had a contractor/consultant onsite to review my Networker
> setup. among other things he insisted that using hardware
> compression on
> a tape library is a "bad thing". the closest thing to an explanation I
> ever heard was that it might cause data loss somehow and that Legato
> wouldn't help me if it did. since contractors have a better
> relationship
> with management than I do he just called STK onsite and had them turn
> compression off on my 9710. I'm wondering if anybody out
> there has ever
> heard anything like this before? does anybody have any
> experience of the
> possible effects, on either reliability or performance, of
> tape hardware
> compression?
> TIA
>
> Jim Lane
> Sr. Technical Consultant
> Network Services
> Toronto Hydro
> office: (416)-542-2820
> cell: (416)-896-8576
>
> --
> Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker"
> command via email
> to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
> http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
> also view and post messages to the list.
> =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
originator of the message. This email message has been scanned
for the presence of computer viruses.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority,
states them to be the views of Wansbeck District Council.
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Networker] tape drive hardware compression a bad thing?, Jim Lane
- Re: [Networker] tape drive hardware compression a bad thing?, Sean Beeg
- Re: [Networker] tape drive hardware compression a bad thing?,
Vince Howard <=
- Re: [Networker] tape drive hardware compression a bad thing?, Garcia, Jose
- Re: [Networker] tape drive hardware compression a bad thing?, Davina Treiber
- Re: [Networker] tape drive hardware compression a bad thing?, Robert Maiello
- Re: [Networker] tape drive hardware compression a bad thing?, Jim Lane
- Re: [Networker] tape drive hardware compression a bad thing?, Jim Lane
- Re: [Networker] tape drive hardware compression a bad thing?, Shaun Ellis
- Re: [Networker] tape drive hardware compression a bad thing?, Jim Lane
- Re: [Networker] tape drive hardware compression a bad thing?, Jim Lane
- Re: [Networker] tape drive hardware compression a bad thing?, Jim Lane
|
|
|