I thought about parallelism. It's not a factor. I'm testing against a single
10GB text file while no other operations are running on the NetWorker
server.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Legate [mailto:rlegate AT SHAW DOT CA]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 11:01 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] Restore times excessive?


Could parallelism be a factor here? Are you staging or writing directly to
tape? Multiplexing will occur when writing directly to tape and this will
increase recovery time, since files are written in parallel and not
sequentially.

Rob Legate
780-493-2625
780 498-6540 cell

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email to
listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can also view
and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely
those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.
Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the
presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused
by any virus transmitted by this email.

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=