Networker

Re: [Networker] 2 ques pls: a. Unknown error 193 (0xc1) b. Client inactive/abandoned.

2003-01-03 09:25:19
Subject: Re: [Networker] 2 ques pls: a. Unknown error 193 (0xc1) b. Client inactive/abandoned.
From: Matts Nilsson <matts_nilsson AT YAHOO DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 15:25:15 +0100
 Hi!
As for problem 1, I'd guess it's a firewall problem
although other clients work fine through the same
firewall. Does all backups fail or only
incremental/level backups?

Problem 2: Have either you or Legato support tried to
get Microsoft to state what an unknown error 193 is?

// Matts

 --- Gary Goldberg <og AT DIGIMARK DOT NET> skrev: > Hi. I've
had two long-term problems -- one is
> simple, but I had to let my
> Legato support run out before I could ask, and the
> other I spent over a year
> with Legato support and could never answer. This is
> a Windows NT 4 SP6a
> installation with Networker Server 6.1.1 build 238
> on an Intel dual 450Mhz P2
> with 1GB of RAM and internal RAID 5 array, external
> dual Spectra Logic Treefrogs
> (total 3GB AIT-1 jukeboxes), and ~10 clients (RH
> Linux, Win2K Server and
> Solaris).
>
> Problem 1:  Some of my clients are running and then
> failing with the message
> "client:/disk has been inactive for 30 minutes since
> {timestamp}"
> "client:/disk is being abandoned by nsrexec."
>
> Does anyone have any diagnostics I can try to
> determine a cause? It seems to
> start the backup fine, but then gets caught. I don't
> want to limit your thinking
> to this, but the only other change recently, is the
> addition of a SonicWALL
> firewall between the nsrserver and client, although
> other nodes with the same
> updates seem to complete without problems.
>
> Problem 2: (THis one is more complex). The nsrserver
> host itself, and all the
> index backups, fail every day, with an Unknown error
> 193 (0xc1) line. Between
> the legato tech people and myself, we tried
> everything we could think of, from
> resetting all the permissions on the system by hand,
> to installing diagnostic
> versions of the Networker server. We never found a
> solution. Their eventual
> sugggestion was to reinstall the operating system or
> upgrade to Windows 2000
> Server. I've never done this as I think it would be
> too disruptive. Any thoughts
> on this?
>
> Thank you in advance for any help. -Gary
>
> -- "We don't see things as they are, we see them as
> we are." - Anais Nin
> Gary Goldberg KA3ZYW <og AT digimark DOT net>
> V:301/249-6501 F:301/390-1955 AIM:OgGreeb
> Digital Marketing/Bowie MD/Systems & Networks
> Consult <http://www.digimark.net/>
>
> --
> Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff
> networker" command via email
> to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's
> Web site at
> http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html
> where you can
> also view and post messages to the list.
>
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

_____________________________________________________
Gratis e-mail resten av livet på www.yahoo.se/mail
Busenkelt!

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=