Networker

Re: [Networker] order of backup

2002-09-24 12:10:23
Subject: Re: [Networker] order of backup
From: "Shelley L. Shostak" <sls AT QSTECH DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 09:10:12 -0700
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Byron Servies wrote:

> Subject: Re: [Networker] order of backup
>
> On September 23, 2002 at 14:22, Zaigui Wang wrote:
> > Experts,
> >
> > If we have a bunch of save sets in the backup pool,
> > how does networker determine which one to back up
> > first?
> >
> > This is a relevant question because in our setup, the
> > largest data set has always been the one that lags
> > behind. Is there a way to make sure that the largest
> > data set always gets kicked off first? Number of
> > sessions does not matter any more once there is only
> > one save set left to be backed up.
> >
> > Will spliting the largest save set into multiple save
> > sets work?
>
> Hi there!
>
> If you have the savesets listed in a single client
> resource, or even multiple resources in the same group,
> then NetWorker will start them all at the same time.
> The smaller savesets begin to save faster because they
> have less index work to do before the save process
> has figured out exactly what files will be saved.
>
> In order to have your large saveset start before the
> smaller ones, you will need to have it in a group
> that starts earlier than the others.
>
> HTH,
>
> Byron
>

There is another way to accomplish this.  Define multiple clients with the
same name and use the Priority field to select which client starts first.

Shelley

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>