I do/can accomplish what you are doing by having separate savesets. You didn't
want that, but it would let you backup everything from one group, and use the
"saveset" attribute of the pool.
In Mr. Sinclair's example below, I'd recommend using the "NULL" directive over
the "SKIP" directive. Using skip might make the skipped directory not show up
for a recover unless you picked a browse time in what might be a small window
between the two saves. Null would avoid this by still skipping the data, but
logging in the index that the directory does still exist.
George - I like your idea, so that you can use "ALL"...can you run both groups
at the same(or near same) time without problems(other than performance)? You
would potentially cause two backup sessions at the same time for the same
saveset. Even though no data would conflict, I'm curious if this would cause
any other potential problems? I'm assuming it wouldn't, but doesn't hurt to
ask around.
-Jason-
-----Original Message-----
From: George Sinclair [mailto:George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:27 PM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] saving sub-dirs to different pool
You could create two instances of the client, each having a separate
directive. The first instance would be a member of group 1 under pool 1,
and the second would be member of group 2 under pool 2. Each client
instance would use its own directive. Client 1's directive would be set
up to back up everything but one of the sub-directories; this one it
would skip. Client 2's directive would be set up to skip everything but
the affected sub-directory. In this manner, both clients could list
'All' for their savesets so you don't have to specifically list the
savesets. We do this all the time, only under Unix. I don't think it
would be any different for NT.
George
Stan Horwitz wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Chuck Davis wrote:
>
> > Networkers,
> >
> > On an NT client, short of re-partitioning and creating additional savesets,
> > is it possible to direct subdirectories of a disk to a separate pool?
>
> Local directives might be a useful tool for you.
>
> --
> Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
> to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
> http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
> also view and post messages to the list.
> =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
InterScan_Disclaimer.txt
Description: Text document
|
