This is customer's choice and how they wish to continue with 
their concept.  However, there are some sites for which I know
customers would like to the same thing due to reorganization
purposes or new network concepts or just because they would
like to spend money so that at the end of year they can ask
for more.

In case of this customer, this is because A and B are remote
sites so they wish to have server per location.

Cheers,
.c

-----Original Message-----
From: Legato NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU]
On Behalf Of Day, David
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 3:40 PM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] Promoting storage node to server
Sensitivity: Confidential


Sorry, have never had to do this.

I am curious though why the need to upgrade?  Is the 
existing Storage Node not able to facilitate the backups 
at their site?  Or are there some technical issues in 
using the current solution?

TIA
David

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=