The "naughtiness", which was in the original message, not yours,
is one of the six words in the default base wordlist in scanmail
for the Sexual Discrimination policy, so it was just a checkbox away...
An automagic attempt to nip inappropriate emails in the bud and prevent
lawsuits. You can see its effectiveness.

My response as to why keyword filtering of adults is ridiculous
would probably set off far more ScanMail filters...=:)

And to at least add a little NetWorker content here, going to
5.7 client-side would probably be the best course of action without
taking the leap to 6.x.x. The 5.7 client was pretty much
5.5.x with official support for the new bits in Win2k.

-ed

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Davina Treiber [mailto:treiber AT HOTPOP DOT COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 4:11 AM
> To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: [Networker] "unknown NT backup type" - apology
>
>
> It appears that my message below was sexually offensive. I
> received an auto-
> responder message shown below. Perhaps someone is being a
> teeny bit over-
> zealous when setting up the lists of words for filtering? So
> obviously I
> wish to apologise for my foul language :-)
>
> > Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content.
> >
> > Place = NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU; ; ; Legato NetWorker
> > discussion;Davina Treiber
> > Sender = Davina Treiber
> > Subject = Re: [Networker] "unknown NT backup type"
> > Delivery Time = August 06, 2002 (Tuesday) 03:57:09
> > Policy = Sexual Discrimination
> > Action on this mail = Quarantine message
> >
> > Warning message from administrator:
> > Notice: A message you sent appears to have violated GE
> > Capital ITS policies
> > for inappropriate language or content and may have not been
> > received by the
> > intended recipient.
>
>
> On Tue, 6 Aug 2002 03:54:29 -0400, Davina Treiber <treiber AT HOTPOP DOT COM>
> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 5 Aug 2002 18:23:21 -0700, Chad R. Larson
> <clarson AT ELDOCOMP DOT COM>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>We've recently added a Windows 2000 Server to our existing
> NT farm, and
> now
> >>we get the following b i t c h-o-grams from Solstice Backup
> 5.1 running on
> >>Solaris 2.6.
> >>
> >>* ecintweb.ecinet.com:C:\ save: unknown NT backup type 0x9 for
> C:\Documents
> >>and Settings\administrator.ECI\Local Settings\Temporary Internet
> >>Files\Content.IE5\5R9CF2LA\002921L0224_D2[1].gif
> >>* ecintweb.ecinet.com:C:\ save: unknown NT backup type 0x7 for
> C:\Documents
> >>and Settings\administrator.ECI\Favorites\Links\
> >>
> >>They're only from the W2k box, the rest of the NT farm
> continues to be
> >>backed as well as it ever was.  Should I take this as a
> sign I need to
> >>update my client software?  I there a patch?  If I upgrade
> the client,
> will
> >>it still be compatible with the server, or does it need to
> be upgraded
> too?
> >
> >If you check the compatibility guide you will find that W2K was not
> >supported until 5.7 (which was released specifically for W2K
> support). You
> >may get away with using 5.7 client software, but then again you might
> >decide that this is a good time for an upgrade to 6.1.x.
> >
>
> --
> Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
> to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
> http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
> also view and post messages to the list.
> =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
>

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=