Re: [ADSM-L] TSM cfg-mgr and managed servers during 5.5 > 6.3 upgrade
2012-06-08 13:52:33
The manual says that you must upgrade the CM first, I believe. Of course, if
it's a designated CM, the size of the db may make it a good candidate to go
first anyway...
On 8 jun. 2012, at 14:49, Skylar Thompson wrote:
> Sorry for the late response to this, my email client helpfully ignored
> ADSM-L messages for a while.
>
> If it helps others, we've been running a v5.5 config manager and v6
> servers for a while, with no issues so far. When I get time (ha!) I'll
> update the config manager to v6.3.
>
> On 02/28/12 13:10, Rick Adamson wrote:
>> I have five version 5.5 TSM Servers that I am preparing to upgrade to
>> 6.3.
>>
>> One server is designated as the configuration manager and the other 4
>> are managed servers for admin schedules, policy domains, etc.
>>
>> While I might have missed it I don't recall the documentation discussing
>> how to handle them.
>>
>>
>>
>> Do I start with the cfg-mgr, the managed servers, does it matter ?
>>
>> When upgraded are the configuration manager and managed server roles
>> retained?
>>
>>
>>
>> I will be using the new system network method and before I get started
>> would like to know how more about how to handle, and feedback or links
>> would be appreciated.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> TIA
>>
>> ~Rick
>>
>> Jacksonville. FL.
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> -- Skylar Thompson (skylar2 AT u.washington DOT edu)
> -- Systems Administrator, Genome Sciences Department
> -- University of Washington, School of Medicine
--
Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,
Remco Post
r.post AT plcs DOT nl
+31 6 248 21 622
|
Previous by Date: |
[ADSM-L] TDP for SQL GUI Restore, Schaub, Steve |
Next by Date: |
[ADSM-L] RMAN Options Unix, Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: [ADSM-L] TSM cfg-mgr and managed servers during 5.5 > 6.3 upgrade, Skylar Thompson |
Next by Thread: |
[ADSM-L] RMAN Options Unix, Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|