Doing some reorganization, we recently moved (server-to-server export)
some nodes from a 6.1.5.10 server to a 6.2.3.0 server.  Now, the occupancy
numbers on the 6.2 (71mb) server are lower than the 6.1.5 (83mb) server,
eventhough the file/object counts are identical (static file system)?

All of the apars I found (so far) that address occupancy information are
at (supposedly) patch levels below these levels.

Anyone else see this kind of discrepancy?

Zoltan Forray
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
zforray AT vcu DOT edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html