Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool
2011-10-17 11:13:40
Allen,
I haven't gone back and looked at the actual memory footprint, sorry. (These
aren't massive servers like yours!)
The post from Stefan is as good as any info I have. I've been using this as a
rule of thumb:
- 12G min for a trivial-size TSM server (i.e. <=50 clients), without dedup or
the ISC
- 16G for larger without dedup
- more for dedup, + 64bit Windows if that's the server platform
+ 4G if the ISC is on the same machine
(I havent' seen a V6 server yet with a DB bigger than 500G, can't wait!)
W
-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Allen S. Rout
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 8:54 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool
On 10/14/2011 04:47 PM, Prather, Wanda wrote:
> I have 2 others (smaller DB's ) that I've converted from production
> 5.5 to 6.2, and have no qualms about recommending it to anybody
> (assuming the server hardware has the required memory). It's been
> stable for them.
Please elaborate on your experiences w.r.t. memory footprint?
It's my major planning unknown; I'm musing about instance count vs. size.
- Allen S. Rout
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, (continued)
- Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Robert Clark
- Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Prather, Wanda
- Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Allen S. Rout
- Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Stefan Folkerts
- Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool,
Prather, Wanda <=
- Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Paul Zarnowski
- Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Allen S. Rout
- Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Shawn Drew
- Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Allen S. Rout
- [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Daniel Sparrman
- Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Ben Bullock
- [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Daniel Sparrman
- Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Thorneycroft, Doug
- Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Ben Bullock
- [ADSM-L] Check signals on Power vs. x86..., Allen S. Rout
|
|
|