ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] TSM policy

2011-06-21 15:24:14
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM policy
From: Remco Post <r.post AT PLCS DOT NL>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:52:03 +0200
On 21 jun 2011, at 20:32, ritchi64 wrote:

> Ok then, I will add some detail to the case,
> 
> The client as a 10 years "restore service level" that said, he can restore 
> everything that was present every night for 2 months. After that, he can 
> restore only the files that were present at the first friday of the month for 
> a year.
> 

this is typical for customers who've never heard of TSM.

> Two years ago a TSM specialist replace old backup software by TSM. he use 
> "keep everything for 400 days" to comply with the client service level. Now 
> we got 2 PB of data on tape. And it's getting worse with more and more VMware 
> machine.
> 

That was some lousy TSM specialist, or a typical sales job... giving the 
customer what he asks for rather than what he needs.

> Now we like to move closer to the service level ask by the client and/or slim 
> the backup process weight. And yes, in some case, we use archive but it's not 
> suit for every Recherche depatment who work on long time data, stop and 
> restart some year after. Destroying data by mistake and not knowing for year 
> that they still need it.
> 

indeed, we have now some detail, but by a long stretch not enough de design a 
proper solution. There are so many variables, that I have no idea where to 
begin. You'll probably need a few weeks of TSM architect/engineer just to 
design the policies and select the right tools for the job.

> 
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] De la part 
>> de Kelly J. Lipp
>> Envoyi : 21 juin 2011 13:44
>> @ : ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>> Objet : Re: [ADSM-L] TSM policy
> 
>> What Remco is saying that the discussion is much more complicated than the
> simple strategy they are currently using.  If they have so much data on tape
> now, keeping the same strategy will keep too much data on tape in the future
> too.  So something must change.  Keeping a month end copy doesn't really
> address the business requirements for archive.  A more complete conversation
> that includes stake holders and compliance folks is required to narrow the
> data down.
> 
>> And since you are now using TSM the typical "keep the month end" stuff just
> doesn't really play as TSM doesn't work like the old product did.  Trying to
> implement that strategy with TSM is very costly in both time and resources
> and still doesn't yield anything truly useful to the business.
> 
>> It's a back to the drawing board of determining actual business requirements
> before trying to implement.  It's there where additional expertise is
> useful.
> 
>> Kelly J. Lipp
>> Elbert Colorado
>> 719-531-5574
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf 
> Of
> ritchi64
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 11:33 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM policy
> 
> Humm!
> What about the policy at your site? Can you share something useful?
> 
> 
> On 21 jun 2011, at 19:45, remco wrote:
> 
>> if you have to ask these questions for such a large environment, I'd
> suggest finding a real TSM >specialist. Somebody who is not afraid to tell
> the customer what sensible backup policies are, and >what the difference
> between a backup and an archive is.
> 
>> +----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> |This was sent by alainrichard AT hotmail DOT com via Backup Central.
>> |Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
>> +----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> --
>> Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,
> 
>> Remco Post
>> r.post AT plcs DOT nl
> 
> 
> On 21 jun 2011, at 17:45, ritchi64 wrote:
> 
>> hello group,
>> 
>> I have to implement TSM server. The client actual policy is "keep
> everything for 2 months and a month copy for a year (standart) and 3 or 5
> years fore some spicial request.
>> 
>> What will be te best way to do that without using to much tape. TSM server
> is 6.1.4 and client active data is ~500 TB. He has actualy ~2PB of data on
> tape (to much).
>> 
> 
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------
> |This was sent by alainrichard AT hotmail DOT com via Backup Central.
> |Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------
> |This was sent by alainrichard AT hotmail DOT com via Backup Central.
> |Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,

Remco Post
r.post AT plcs DOT nl
+31 6 248 21 622

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>