ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Why is restore -filelist so much faster?

2011-06-17 19:44:34
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Why is restore -filelist so much faster?
From: Roger Deschner <rogerd AT UIC DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:42:14 -0500
Thanks a lot! I will try this out. But I am left wondering why, in my
environment, is Classic Restore so much faster than No Query Restore?

Roger Deschner      University of Illinois at Chicago     rogerd AT uic DOT edu



On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Wolfgang J Moeller wrote:

>A few hours ago, I wrote:
>
>>[...]
>> In my understanding,
>>
>>    QUERY BACKUP ... -> <edit> -> RESTORE -FILELIST
>>
>> ought to be essentially the same as
>>
>>    RESTORE ... -TESTFLAG=DISABLENQR
>>
>> (or what the latter is called in your line-mode client).
>>[...]
>
>Alert: As of 6.2.2.0, DSMC _ignores_ (w/o warning :-() "-TESTFLAGS=DISABLENQR"
>~because~ the (now documented) option meanwhile is called "-DISABLENQR=YES".
>So one should try
>
>   RESTORE ... -DISABLENQR=YES
>
>first, and if the client is old enough to reject that, use -TESTFLAGS
>(or -TRACEFLAGS with real ancient clients).
>
>
>Best regards,
>
>       Wolfgang J. Moeller <moeller AT gwdg DOT de>
>
>Tel. +49 551 201-1516 ... not representing ... GWDG, Goettingen, Germany
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>