ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Re: Policy for NDMP dumps

2011-05-04 18:46:15
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Re: Policy for NDMP dumps
From: Shawn Drew <shawn.drew AT AMERICAS.BNPPARIBAS DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 18:40:56 -0400
I have seen this go wrong.    It will allow you to select different
management classes for the DIFF than the FULL, however the FULL's will
rebind making this pointless.
So if you backed up the FULL with mgmt class "01YEAR" and the DIFF with
management class "35DAY", the FULL will rebind to "35DAY" as well.
I've seen a lot of FULL backups get lost like this.

You need to keep a separate Full/Diff series for each retention that you
want.  .  I do this by creating a virtualfs called "Filesystem_01YEAR" and
point that to the same file system.  Let me know if you want more detail.

Regards,
Shawn
________________________________________________
Shawn Drew





Internet
david-bronder AT UIOWA DOT EDU

Sent by: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
05/04/2011 05:21 PM
Please respond to
ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU


To
ADSM-L
cc

Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] Re: Policy for NDMP dumps






Gee, Norman wrote:
>
> You can assign a different management class to full and differentials.
> I have defined them to different tape storage pools.

That would work for storing the different NDMP images in different
storage pools.  But my experience matches Remco's: each "backup node"
command that specifies a different management class will rebind all
backups (full or differential) for that node/filespace, including
adjusting the retention.

I finally gave up trying to use longer retention for full NDMP images
(e.g., a year) and shorter retention for differential images (e.g.,
four weeks).  Though I never tried Remco's suggestion of sending the
differentials to a different node name with different policy.

I have nothing good to say about NDMP.  It had its place 15 or 20 years
ago, but not today.  I'm really hoping I'll be able to replace NDMP for
our NetApp backups with SnapDiff-based backups.  That should save time
and space, should generally perform better, and of particular interest
to me, should get rid of long-running single-object transactions that
pin the recovery log for insane lengths of time (inevitably filling the
recovery log to 90+% and eventually auto-canceling the NDMP job just
before if finally completes, wasting 20+ hours of time and terabytes of
bandwidth plus sometimes dozens of tapes for TSM DB backups).

(Unfortunately for Wanda, SnapDiff is NetApp/N-series only, so it won't
help her Celerra backup situation.)


--
Hello World.                                    David Bronder - Systems
Admin
Segmentation Fault                                      ITS-EI, Univ. of
Iowa
Core dumped, disk trashed, quota filled, soda warm.
david-bronder AT uiowa DOT edu



This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for
the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error,
please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord
with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial,
is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the
integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will)
not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that certain
functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas RCC, Inc.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>